1. Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins B.V. [
DOI:10.1075/scl.24]
2. Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers:Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. Peter Lang, 17, 294.
3. Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics , 1091-1112. [
DOI:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00035-8]
4. Ilie, C. (2003). Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics , John Benjamins Publishing Company, 71_92.
5. Hui, J. & Na, B. (2008). Use of metadiscourse markers in allocating SLA learners' attention.Sino-Us English Teaching (T. a. Stella, Ed.) 5, 5.
6. Kuo, C.-H. (1998). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationship in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purpose , 121-138.
7. Rasekh, D. E. (2010). Metadiscourse: Definitions, issues and its implications for English teacher. English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, 3, 167.
8. Toumi, N. (2009). A Model for the investigation of reflexive metadiscourse in research articles. Language Studies Working Papers, 64-73.
9. Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing?: A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics . [
DOI:10.1111/j.1473-4192.1998.tb00128.x]
10. Craig, R. T. (2005). How we talk about how we talk: Communication theory in the public interest. Journal of Communication, 55, 659-667. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03015.x]